Content

As first-generation advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) systems approach end-of-life, utilities across North America are facing a pivotal decision: upgrade existing infrastructure or invest in full system replacement?

In a recent Factor This article, Util-Assist’s Brent Williams breaks down the strategic and financial considerations behind both options. Key factors influencing the path forward include:

  • Strategic alignment: Whether AMI decisions support long-term grid modernization goals, customer engagement strategies, and data-driven operations
  • Technology evolution: The extent to which AMI 1.0 systems can meet emerging functional requirements compared to the capabilities offered by AMI 2.0 platforms
  • Operational risk: Evaluation of AMI 1.0 asset performance, including failure trends and maintenance demands that could affect reliability and service continuity
  • Long-term value: Comparison of lifecycle costs, performance sustainability, and the ability of each path to deliver lasting operational and business benefits

These insights were also the focus of our recent Current Conversations webinar, “Upgrade or Replace? The Great AMI Debate,” where Brent explored how utilities can approach this decision with confidence.

Read the full article: The Big AMI Question – Renewable Energy World
Watch the webinar: Current Conversations – AMI Upgrade or Replace

Looking for guidance on your AMI journey?

Whether you’re maximizing the value of existing of existing infrastructure or investing in next-generation capabilities, the right decision depends on your unique operational goals and strategic priorities.

Util-Assist’s team of industry experts is here to support you at every stage of the AMI journey. We partner with utilities to evaluate options, build compelling business cases, and develop roadmaps that align with long-term vision and stakeholder needs, helping to ensure that your next AMI decision drives lasting success for your utility.